↓ Skip to main content

Intensity contrast as a crucial cue for butterfly landing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Intensity contrast as a crucial cue for butterfly landing
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00359-011-0671-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisaharu Koshitaka, Kentaro Arikawa, Michiyo Kinoshita

Abstract

Papilio butterflies use a tetrachromatic color vision to discriminate a rewarding flower, approach, land and take nectar from the flower. In the course of further analyzing their foraging behavior in a laboratory condition, we found that some butterflies could not land on the target flower even they discriminated and tried to land on it, especially when the target was dark. This phenomenon, which we call "landing suppression", indicates that the cue for landing differs from the cue for visually locating a flower. We hypothesized that a possible cue for landing was intensity contrast between the target and background, and have initiated to test this hypothesis. We tested the butterflies' landing behavior to targets of various colors and intensities presented on background of black or various densities of gray. As a result, the landing was most strongly suppressed when the intensity contrast was close to zero irrespective of the target colors, suggesting that the butterflies used the target-background intensity contrast when landing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 3 12%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 58%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%