↓ Skip to main content

Robotic Total Pelvic Exenteration: Video-Illustrated Technique

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Robotic Total Pelvic Exenteration: Video-Illustrated Technique
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6036-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis T. Konstantinidis, William Chu, Federico Tozzi, Clayton Lau, Mark Wakabayashi, Kevin Chan, Byrne Lee

Abstract

Robotic-assisted total pelvic exenteration (TPE) can offer a minimally invasive approach to a major multi-organ operation. In this video, we summarize a stepwise approach to robotic TPE in a 70 year-old female Jehovah's witness with a history of cervical cancer post-chemoradiation and radical hysterectomy who experienced local recurrence at the vaginal cuff involving the rectum and bladder. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position. A total of six robotic ports were used and the da Vinci Si robotic system was docked between the legs. We proceeded as follows: (1) the abdomen and pelvis were thoroughly explored for evidence of metastatic disease; (2) the pelvic sidewalls were mobilized and bilateral ureters identified; (3) the mesorectal plane was dissected to the level of the levators; (4) the lateral and anterior pelvic structures were completely mobilized, and parametrial tissues were mobilized to the pelvic wall; (5) the bladder was separated from the pubis symphysis, the space of Retzius entered, and the bladder and proximal urethra freed; (6) a perineal incision was made around the vagina, perineal body, and anus, which were excised; (7) an Alloderm mesh secured the pelvic floor, and an omental J flap was mobilized; and (8) a 6 cm incision was utilized for creation of an ileal conduit and a permanent-end colostomy. Final pathology was consistent with recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma invading into the vaginal, bladder, and rectal walls. Surgical margins and seven lymph nodes were negative for carcinoma. Robotic-assisted TPE is technically feasible in a Jehovah's witness under a multidisciplinary surgical team, even in the setting of prior radical hysterectomy and irradiated tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,987,273
of 24,676,547 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#797
of 6,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,556
of 322,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#18
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,676,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.