↓ Skip to main content

A Mixed-Methods Study of Condom Use and Decision Making Among Adolescent Gay and Bisexual Males

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
A Mixed-Methods Study of Condom Use and Decision Making Among Adolescent Gay and Bisexual Males
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0810-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Mustanski, L. Zachary DuBois, Tonya L. Prescott, Michele L. Ybarra

Abstract

Young men who have sex with men have the highest rates of new HIV infections in the U.S., but they have been understudied relative to other populations. As a formative step for the development of a text messaging HIV prevention intervention, this mixed methods study aimed to understand how adolescent gay and bisexual males (AGBM) make decisions about condom use and factors that may differ based on age, sexual experience, and rural versus urban residency. Four online, asynchronous focus groups were conducted with 75 14-18 year old AGBM across the U.S. Qualitative analyses uncovered themes related to relationship influences on condom use (e.g. marriage, trust), access issues, and attitudes and experiences that both encouraged as well as discouraged condom use. Mixed methods analyses explored differences between groups in endorsement of themes. For example, younger and sexually experienced participants were more likely to report the cost of condoms was prohibitive and sexually experienced and rural youth were more likely to describe being influenced by emotional aspects of the relationship. These data highlight both opportunities for as well as the importance of tailoring HIV prevention programs for sub-groups of AGBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Psychology 16 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 45 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,632,549
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,042
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,206
of 230,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.