↓ Skip to main content

2D and 3D separation of stresses using automated photoelasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Mechanics, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
2D and 3D separation of stresses using automated photoelasticity
Published in
Experimental Mechanics, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02318018
Authors

S. J. Haake, E. A. Patterson, Z. F. Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Mexico 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 41%
Physics and Astronomy 3 14%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Mechanics
#365
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,459
of 29,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Mechanics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.