↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy versus Graston Technique in the treatment of non-specific thoracic spine pain: Design of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy versus Graston Technique in the treatment of non-specific thoracic spine pain: Design of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-16-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Crothers, Bruce Walker, Simon D French

Abstract

The one year prevalence of thoracic back pain has been estimated as 17% compared to 64% for neck pain and 67% for low back pain. At present only one randomised controlled trial has been performed assessing the efficacy of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for thoracic spine pain. In addition no high quality trials have been performed to test the efficacy and effectiveness of Graston Technique (GT), a soft tissue massage therapy using hand-held stainless steel instruments. The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of SMT and GT compared to a placebo for the treatment of non specific thoracic spine pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 26 22%