↓ Skip to main content

On the Quantization of Time-Varying Phase Synchrony Patterns into Distinct Functional Connectivity Microstates (FCμstates) in a Multi-trial Visual ERP Paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
On the Quantization of Time-Varying Phase Synchrony Patterns into Distinct Functional Connectivity Microstates (FCμstates) in a Multi-trial Visual ERP Paradigm
Published in
Brain Topography, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10548-013-0276-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. I. Dimitriadis, N. A. Laskaris, A. Tzelepi

Abstract

The analysis of functional brain connectivity has been supported by various techniques encompassing spatiotemporal interactions between distinct areas and enabling the description of network organization. Different brain states are known to be associated with specific connectivity patterns. We introduce here the concept of functional connectivity microstates (FCμstates) as short lasting connectivity patterns resulting from the discretization of temporal variations in connectivity and mediating a parsimonious representation of coordinated activity in the brain. Modifying a well-established framework for mining brain dynamics, we show that a small sized repertoire of FCμstates can be derived so as to encapsulate both the inter-subject and inter-trial response variability and further provide novel insights into cognition. The main practical advantage of our approach lies in the fact that time-varying connectivity analysis can be simplified significantly by considering each FCμstate as prototypical connectivity pattern, and this is achieved without sacrificing the temporal aspects of dynamics. Multi-trial datasets from a visual ERP experiment were employed so as to provide a proof of concept, while phase synchrony was emphasized in the description of connectivity structure. The power of FCμstates in knowledge discovery is demonstrated through the application of network topology descriptors. Their time-evolution and association with event-related responses is explored.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Finland 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 30%
Researcher 10 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 20%
Neuroscience 12 20%
Psychology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#423
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,599
of 193,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.