↓ Skip to main content

Racial disparities in initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy of early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Racial disparities in initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy of early breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10549-014-2957-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Stacie B. Dusetzina, Huan Liu, Stephanie B. Wheeler

Abstract

Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. The survival gap between African-American (AA) and white women with breast cancer is most pronounced in HR+ subtypes, and could be related to differences in ET use. The relationship between race and initiation of ET is not well defined. We investigated patterns of ET initiation by race in a diverse cohort of women covered by commercial health insurance. We identified 2,640 women with incident HR+ breast cancer in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry whose records linked to commercial insurance claims using the Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System (ICISS) database. The sample included women age <65 years diagnosed with stage I-III HR+ cancers between 2004 and 2009. We used multivariate Poisson regression to examine the effect of race on likelihood of initiating ET. 14 % of women did not initiate ET within 12 months of diagnosis. AA women were 17 % less likely to initiate ET than whites (aRR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.74-0.93). When analyzed by subset, racial disparities persisted among women who received chemotherapy (aHR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.56-0.80) but not among women who did not receive chemotherapy (aHR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.76-1.21). AA women in our sample were less likely to initiate ET than whites, and this disparity was concentrated among chemotherapy-treated women. ET under-utilization may contribute to the racial survival gap in HR+ breast cancer, and represents an opportunity for intervention to reduce breast cancer disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,060,804
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#2,840
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,552
of 227,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#39
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.