↓ Skip to main content

Racial and ethnic bias in decisions to shoot seen through a stronger lens: experimental results from high-fidelity laboratory simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Criminology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
64 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Racial and ethnic bias in decisions to shoot seen through a stronger lens: experimental results from high-fidelity laboratory simulations
Published in
Journal of Experimental Criminology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11292-014-9204-9
Authors

Lois James, David Klinger, Bryan Vila

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 45%
Social Sciences 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#389,856
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#15
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,245
of 240,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them