| Title |
The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) Multiinstitution Evaluation of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) in 1,013 Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3798-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesus Esquivel, Andrew M. Lowy, Maurie Markman, Terence Chua, Joerg Pelz, Dario Baratti, Joel M. Baumgartner, Richard Berri, Pedro Bretcha-Boix, Marcello Deraco, Guillermo Flores-Ayala, Olivier Glehen, Alberto Gomez-Portilla, Santiago González-Moreno, Martin Goodman, Evgenia Halkia, Shigeki Kusamura, Mecker Moller, Guillaume Passot, Marc Pocard, George Salti, Armando Sardi, Maheswari Senthil, John Spilioitis, Juan Torres-Melero, Kiran Turaga, Richard Trout |
| Abstract |
Extensive clinical experience suggests that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may play an important role in the management of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRCPC). However, there remains no established nonsurgical process to rationally select patients for this management, either for inclusion/stratification in clinical trials or as a component of standard of care. The Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) was introduced as a basis to improve patient selection. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 63% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,933,119
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#816
of 6,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,705
of 226,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.