↓ Skip to main content

Indicators of adherence to physiotherapy attendance among Saudi female patients with mechanical low back pain: a clinical audit

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Indicators of adherence to physiotherapy attendance among Saudi female patients with mechanical low back pain: a clinical audit
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Einas Al-Eisa

Abstract

Among current musculoskeletal interventions used to treat low back pain (LBP), physiotherapy exercise has the highest evidence of effectiveness in avoiding recurrence and chronic disability. However, effectiveness of physiotherapy is thought to be directly related to the patients' adherence to physiotherapy. Since adherence is reported to be directly influenced by socio-cultural factors, this study was conducted to investigate factors related to patients' adherence in a group of Saudi female patients with LBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 22%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,781,727
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,295
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,403
of 93,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.