Title |
Indicators of adherence to physiotherapy attendance among Saudi female patients with mechanical low back pain: a clinical audit
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Einas Al-Eisa |
Abstract |
Among current musculoskeletal interventions used to treat low back pain (LBP), physiotherapy exercise has the highest evidence of effectiveness in avoiding recurrence and chronic disability. However, effectiveness of physiotherapy is thought to be directly related to the patients' adherence to physiotherapy. Since adherence is reported to be directly influenced by socio-cultural factors, this study was conducted to investigate factors related to patients' adherence in a group of Saudi female patients with LBP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Researcher | 7 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 21% |
Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,781,727
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,295
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,403
of 93,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.