↓ Skip to main content

Avian influenza virus directly infects human natural killer cells and inhibits cell activity

Overview of attention for article published in Virologica Sinica, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Avian influenza virus directly infects human natural killer cells and inhibits cell activity
Published in
Virologica Sinica, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12250-016-3918-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huawei Mao, Yinping Liu, Sin Fun Sia, J. S. Malik Peiris, Yu-Lung Lau, Wenwei Tu

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cell is a key component of innate immunity and plays an important role in host defense against virus infection by directly destroying infected cells. Influenza is a respiratory disease transmitted in the early phase of virus infection. Evasion of host innate immunity including NK cells is critical for the virus to expand and establish a successful acute infection. Previously, we showed that human influenza H1N1 virus infects NK cells and induces cell apoptosis, as well as inhibits NK cell activity. In this study, we further demonstrated that avian influenza virus also directly targeted NK cells as an immunoevasion strategy. The avian virus infected human NK cells and induced cell apoptosis. In addition, avian influenza virion and HA protein inhibited NK cell cytotoxicity. This novel strategy has obvious advantages for avian influenza virus, allowing the virus sufficient time to expand and subsequent spread before the onset of the specific immune response. Our findings provide an important clue for the immunopathogenesis of avian influenza, and also suggest that direct targeting NK cells may be a common strategy used by both human and avian influenza viruses to evade NK cell immunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,952,935
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Virologica Sinica
#267
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,280
of 311,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virologica Sinica
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.