Title |
Bounds for phylogenetic network space metrics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00285-017-1171-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Francis, Katharina T. Huber, Vincent Moulton, Taoyang Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 45% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 4 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#449
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,354
of 317,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.