↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical Programming Models for Determining the Optimal Location of Beehives

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Mathematical Programming Models for Determining the Optimal Location of Beehives
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11538-014-9943-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maica Krizna A. Gavina, Jomar F. Rabajante, Cleofas R. Cervancia

Abstract

Farmers frequently decide where to locate the colonies of their domesticated eusocial bees, especially given the following mutually exclusive scenarios: (i) there are limited nectar and pollen sources within the vicinity of the apiary that cause competition among foragers; and (ii) there are fewer pollinators compared to the number of inflorescence that may lead to suboptimal pollination of crops. We hypothesize that optimally distributing the beehives in the apiary can help address the two scenarios stated above. In this paper, we develop quantitative models (specifically using linear programming) for addressing the two given scenarios. We formulate models involving the following factors: (i) fuzzy preference of the beekeeper; (ii) number of available colonies; (iii) unknown-but-bounded strength of colonies; (iv) probabilistic carrying capacity of the plant clusters; and (v) spatial orientation of the apiary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 40%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Mathematics 5 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,179,920
of 25,255,356 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#119
of 1,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,426
of 228,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,255,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.