↓ Skip to main content

Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
660 Mendeley
Title
Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00253-010-2573-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elke Genersch

Abstract

Managed honey bees are the most important commercial pollinators of those crops which depend on animal pollination for reproduction and which account for 35% of the global food production. Hence, they are vital for an economic, sustainable agriculture and for food security. In addition, honey bees also pollinate a variety of wild flowers and, therefore, contribute to the biodiversity of many ecosystems. Honey and other hive products are, at least economically and ecologically rather, by-products of beekeeping. Due to this outstanding role of honey bees, severe and inexplicable honey bee colony losses, which have been reported recently to be steadily increasing, have attracted much attention and stimulated many research activities. Although the phenomenon "decline of honey bees" is far from being finally solved, consensus exists that pests and pathogens are the single most important cause of otherwise inexplicable colony losses. This review will focus on selected bee pathogens and parasites which have been demonstrated to be involved in colony losses in different regions of the world and which, therefore, are considered current threats to honey bees and beekeeping.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 631 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 139 21%
Student > Master 124 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 14%
Researcher 70 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 75 11%
Unknown 129 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 292 44%
Environmental Science 57 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 7%
Social Sciences 20 3%
Chemistry 18 3%
Other 83 13%
Unknown 142 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,570,763
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#93
of 8,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,169
of 105,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.