↓ Skip to main content

Innate Antiviral Immunity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Innate Antiviral Immunity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Application of Humanized Mouse Models for the Study of Human Exclusive Viruses
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Zebrafish as a Model for the Study of Host-Virus Interactions
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Northern Blot Detection of Virus-Derived Small Interfering RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans Using Nonradioactive Oligo Probes
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Extraction and qPCR-Based Detection of miRNAs from Cultured PBMCs of Bubaline Origin
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Visualizing Virus-Derived dsRNA Using Antibody-Independent and -Dependent Methods
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 RNA PAMPs as Molecular Tools for Evaluating RIG-I Function in Innate Immunity
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Methods to Visualize MAVS Subcellular Localization
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Purification of Cyclic GMP-AMP from Viruses and Measurement of Its Activity in Cell Culture
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 cGAMP Quantification in Virus-Infected Human Monocyte-Derived Cells by HPLC-Coupled Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods of Assessing STING Activation and Trafficking
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genome-Wide CRISPR/Cas9 Screening for High-Throughput Functional Genomics in Human Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 High-Throughput Screening for Identification of Novel Innate Immune Activators
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chromosome Conformation Capture for Research on Innate Antiviral Immunity
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Discovery of Variants Underlying Host Susceptibility to Virus Infection Using Whole-Exome Sequencing
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Isolation, Purification, and Culture of Primary Murine Sensory Neurons
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells from Mouse Lungs
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Epidemiological Methods
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Erratum to: Purification of Cyclic GMP-AMP from Viruses and Measurement of Its Activity in Cell Culture
Attention for Chapter 8: Purification of Cyclic GMP-AMP from Viruses and Measurement of Its Activity in Cell Culture
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Purification of Cyclic GMP-AMP from Viruses and Measurement of Its Activity in Cell Culture
Chapter number 8
Book title
Innate Antiviral Immunity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7237-1_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7236-4, 978-1-4939-7237-1
Authors

Alice Mayer, Jonathan Maelfait, Anne Bridgeman, Jan Rehwinkel, Mayer, Alice, Maelfait, Jonathan, Bridgeman, Anne, Rehwinkel, Jan

Abstract

Sensing of cytoplasmic DNA by cGAS is essential for the initiation of immune responses against several viruses. cGAS also plays important roles in some autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases and may be involved in immune responses targeting cancer cells. Once activated, cGAS catalyzes the formation of the di-nucleotide 2'-3'-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which propagates a signaling cascade leading to the production of type I interferons (IFNs). Interestingly, cGAMP is incorporated into enveloped viruses and is transferred to newly infected cells by virions. In this article, we describe a method to purify cGAMP from viral particles and a bioassay to measure its activity. This assay takes advantage of a reporter cell line that expresses the genes encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) and firefly luciferase under the control of the IFNß promoter, allowing the testing of several samples in a single experiment taking not more than 3 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,491,993
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,608
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,078
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#324
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.