↓ Skip to main content

Glass groups, glass supply and recycling in late Roman Carthage

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Glass groups, glass supply and recycling in late Roman Carthage
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0316-1
Authors

Nadine Schibille, Allison Sterrett-Krause, Ian C. Freestone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 27 38%
Chemistry 9 13%
Materials Science 8 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#560
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,342
of 299,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.