↓ Skip to main content

A group-specific arbitrary tradition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
91 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
A group-specific arbitrary tradition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Published in
Animal Cognition, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10071-014-0766-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen, Katherine A. Cronin, Daniel B. M. Haun

Abstract

Social learning in chimpanzees has been studied extensively and it is now widely accepted that chimpanzees have the capacity to learn from conspecifics through a multitude of mechanisms. Very few studies, however, have documented the existence of spontaneously emerged traditions in chimpanzee communities. While the rigour of experimental studies is helpful to investigate social learning mechanisms, documentation of naturally occurring traditions is necessary to understand the relevance of social learning in the real lives of animals. In this study, we report on chimpanzees spontaneously copying a seemingly non-adaptive behaviour ("grass-in-ear behaviour"). The behaviour entailed chimpanzees selecting a stiff, straw-like blade of grass, inserting the grass into one of their own ears, adjusting the position, and then leaving it in their ear during subsequent activities. Using a daily focal follow procedure, over the course of 1 year, we observed 8 (out of 12) group members engaging in this peculiar behaviour. Importantly, in the three neighbouring groups of chimpanzees (n = 82), this behaviour was only observed once, indicating that ecological factors were not determiners of the prevalence of this behaviour. These observations show that chimpanzees have a tendency to copy each other's behaviour, even when the adaptive value of the behaviour is presumably absent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 10 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 25%
Psychology 35 24%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#193,433
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#61
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,493
of 244,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.