↓ Skip to main content

Impact of visual–spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Impact of visual–spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5789-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul J. Roch, Henriette M. Rangnick, Julia A. Brzoska, Laura Benner, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Philip C. Müller, Hannes G. Kenngott, Beat-Peter Müller-Stich, Felix Nickel

Abstract

Technical limitations of minimally invasive surgery challenge both surgeons and camera assistants. Current research indicates that visual-spatial ability (VSA) has impact on learning of laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN). However, it remains unclear if complexity of LCN tasks influences the impact of VSA. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of VSA on LCN training within tasks of different complexity levels. The present study was conducted as a monocentric prospective trial. VSA was assessed with a cube comparison test before participants underwent LCN training. LCN training consisted of three tasks with increasing complexity. Each task was performed four times and performance was assessed each time. Correlations and multivariate regression analysis were used to assess the influence of VSA on LCN skills. Seventy-one participants were included (35 males). Significant performance improvement and faster completion times were observed from the first to fourth trial of all three LCN training tasks. Significant positive correlations between VSA and performance on LCN task 3 were found (performance: r s = 0.47; p < 0.001, time: r s = -0.43; p < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that higher VSA resulted in greater reduction of time between the first trials of LCN training task 3 (B = -1.67, p = 0.031). In the present study, all trainees improved LCN performance during the training. VSA seems to have impact on LCN performance and training progress particularly for complex LCN tasks. The relation of VSA and LCN performance was stronger for less experienced participants and in the beginning of the learning phase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,792
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,258
of 317,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#119
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.