↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral physiological responses to subliminally presented negative affective stimuli: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peripheral physiological responses to subliminally presented negative affective stimuli: A systematic review
Published in
Biological Psychology, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie M. van der Ploeg, Jos F. Brosschot, Anke Versluis, Bart Verkuil

Abstract

Negative affective information may be presented outside of awareness and change physiological activity. By increasing peripheral physiological activity, subliminally presented negative affective information may contribute to the development of disease. The current systematic review evaluated 65 studies in which negative affective stimuli were presented subliminally to a healthy sample while cardiovascular, electrodermal, electromyographical, hormonal, or immunological activity was measured. Overall, 41% of the tested contrasts indicated significant increases due to negative affective stimuli compared to control stimuli. These effects were most pronounced in fear-conditioning studies measuring skin conductance response amplitude and priming studies measuring systolic blood pressure. However, across the included studies the methodology varied substantially and the number of contrasts per physiological parameter was limited. Thus, although some evidence exists that subliminally presented negative affective stimuli can induce adverse peripheral physiological changes, this has not yet been addressed sufficiently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 44%
Neuroscience 9 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,707,591
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#302
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,914
of 324,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.