↓ Skip to main content

Four symptoms define the piriformis syndrome: an updated systematic review of its clinical features

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 973)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Four symptoms define the piriformis syndrome: an updated systematic review of its clinical features
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00590-017-2031-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevork Hopayian, Armine Danielyan

Abstract

To update the evidence on the clinical features of the piriformis syndrome since the first systematic review published in 2010. A systematic review of all case, cross-sectional and prevalence studies. The commonest features reported were: buttock pain, pain aggravated on sitting, external tenderness near the greater sciatic notch and pain on any maneuver that increases piriformis muscle tension, and limitation of straight leg raising. The quality of case reports since the previous review has not improved with considerable under-reporting of presumed negative tests. Three recent cross-sectional and prevalence studies have been reported, but the two larger studies are at high risk of bias. Piriformis syndrome can be defined by a quartet of symptoms and signs. Many physical tests have been described, but the accuracy of these tests and the symptoms cannot be concluded from studies to date. Straight leg raising does not rule out the diagnosis. Piriformis syndrome is at a stage previously encountered with herniated intervertebral disc: that piriformis muscle pathology can cause sciatica has been demonstrated, but its prevalence among low back pain and sciatica sufferers and the diagnostic accuracy of clinical features requires cross-sectional studies free of incorporation and verification biases. One small cross-sectional study provides an encouraging example of how such studies could be conducted but would need replication in a broader population and better reporting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 13 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 71 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 19%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 79 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,355,763
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#19
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,255
of 328,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.