↓ Skip to main content

Adult Outcomes in Autism: Community Inclusion and Living Skills

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult Outcomes in Autism: Community Inclusion and Living Skills
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2159-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie M. Gray, Caroline M. Keating, John R. Taffe, Avril V. Brereton, Stewart L. Einfeld, Tessa C. Reardon, Bruce J. Tonge

Abstract

Longitudinal research has demonstrated that social outcomes for adults with autism are restricted, particularly in terms of employment and living arrangements. However, understanding of individual and environmental factors that influence these outcomes is far from complete. This longitudinal study followed a community sample of children and adolescents with autism into adulthood. Social outcomes in relation to community inclusion and living skills were examined, including the predictive role of a range of individual factors and the environment (socio-economic disadvantage). Overall, the degree of community inclusion and living skills was restricted for the majority, and while childhood IQ was an important determinant of these outcomes, it was not the sole predictor. The implications of these findings in relation to interventions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 27%
Social Sciences 47 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 77 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,992,644
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,425
of 5,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,909
of 244,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.