| Title |
On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data: an assessment and recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth Science Informatics, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12145-011-0083-6 |
| Authors |
Ruth E. Duerr, Robert R. Downs, Curt Tilmes, Bruce Barkstrom, W. Christopher Lenhardt, Joseph Glassy, Luis E. Bermudez, Peter Slaughter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Librarian | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 29 | 39% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,923,751
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Earth Science Informatics
#6
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,901
of 118,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Science Informatics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them