↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term effect of childhood liver transplantation on body cell mass

Overview of attention for article published in Liver Transplantation, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term effect of childhood liver transplantation on body cell mass
Published in
Liver Transplantation, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/lt.23891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Looi Cheng Ee, Rebecca Joanne Hill, Kerrie Beale, Charlton Noble, Jonathan Fawcett, Geoffrey John Cleghorn

Abstract

Objective: Malnutrition is common in end-stage liver disease but correction after transplant is expected. Body cell mass (BCM) assessment using total body potassium (TBK) measurement is considered the "gold standard" for assessing nutritional status. The aim of this study was to examine BCM and therefore nutritional status of long-term survivors after childhood liver transplantation. Methods: Longitudinal nested cohort study of patients transplanted aged <18 years, surviving >3 years, with ongoing review at our centre. TBK measurements were obtained pre-transplant, and at long-term follow up. BCM was calculated from TBK and adjusted for height raised to the power p depending on gender (BCM/Height(p) ). The effect of age at transplant, linear growth impairment, biliary atresia diagnosis, and steroid use were assessed. Results: 32 patients, 20 males, participated. 62% had biliary atresia. Median age at transplant was 2.11 (range 0.38-10.92) years. Post-transplant testing was performed at median 7.23 (range 3.28-14.99) years when they were aged 10.12 (range 4.56-20.77) years. This cohort attained mean (±SD) Z-scores for height -0.41 (±1.36), weight -0.26 (±1.14), and body mass index 0.04 (±0.99). BCM/Height(p) was reduced pre-transplant but further reduced post-transplant (p<0.001) despite normalization of height and weight. Weight recovery is therefore likely from increased fat mass, not BCM. Linear growth impairment was associated with greater reduction in post-transplant BCM/Height(p) (p=0.02). On multivariate analyses, only older age at transplant predicted reduced post-transplant BCM/Height(p) (p=0.02). Gender, age at transplant, steroid use, and underlying diagnosis, did not predict change in BCM/Height(p) after transplant. Conclusions: Weight recovery in long-term survivors of childhood liver transplant is likely due to increased fat mass since BCM remains reduced. Nutritional compromise persists in long-term survivors of childhood liver transplant. Liver Transpl , 2014. © 2014 AASLD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,524,919
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Liver Transplantation
#97
of 2,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,937
of 243,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Liver Transplantation
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.