You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducibility of Regional and Global Longitudinal Strains Derived from Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking and Doppler Tissue Imaging between Expert and Novice Readers during Quantitative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (Online), June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akira Yamada, Sushil A. Luis, Daniel Sathianathan, Bijoy K. Khandheria, James Cafaro, Christian R. Hamilton-Craig, David G. Platts, Luke Haseler, Darryl Burstow, Jonathan Chan |
| Abstract |
Longitudinal strain (LS) is a quantitative parameter that adds incremental value to wall motion analysis. The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility of LS derived from Doppler tissue imaging and speckle-tracking between an expert and a novice strain reader during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 57% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (Online)
#1,493
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,668
of 241,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (Online)
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.