↓ Skip to main content

A Longitudinal Study of Childhood Depression and Anxiety in Relation to Weight Gain

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
A Longitudinal Study of Childhood Depression and Anxiety in Relation to Weight Gain
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10578-009-0141-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana L. Rofey, Rachel P. Kolko, Ana-Maria Iosif, Jennifer S. Silk, James E. Bost, Wentao Feng, Eva M. Szigethy, Robert B. Noll, Neal D. Ryan, Ronald E. Dahl

Abstract

Adult mood disturbances are highly correlated with obesity, although little is known about the developmental relationship between mood disorders and weight. This study investigated the relationship between childhood psychopathology and weight over the course of 3 years. Body Mass Index (BMI) percentiles and demographic data of children (ages 8-18) with depression (n = 143) or anxiety (n = 43) were compared to healthy controls (n = 99). Both childhood depression (chi(2) = 4.6, p = 0.03) and anxiety (chi(2) = 6.0, p = 0.01) were associated with increased BMI percentiles. Compared to controls, BMI percentiles of depressed females over the course of the study differed profoundly (chi(2) = 7.0, p = 0.01) and BMI percentiles of anxious females approached significance (chi(2) = 3.7, p = 0.06). Males with anxiety showed a greater trend towards overweight (chi(2) = 3.3, p = 0.07) in comparison to controls. The major finding that depression and anxiety are associated with increased BMI percentiles in a non-obese sample suggests that childhood psychopathology is an important factor that should be carefully monitored.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 43 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 47 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,686,111
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#191
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,953
of 92,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.