↓ Skip to main content

Dust devil generation

Overview of attention for article published in Physica Scripta, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dust devil generation
Published in
Physica Scripta, June 2014
DOI 10.1088/0031-8949/89/7/075606
Authors

O G Onishchenko, W Horton, O A Pokhotelov, L Stenflo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 50%
Physics and Astronomy 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Physica Scripta
#1,252
of 3,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,093
of 228,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physica Scripta
#28
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.