↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a standardized training program on midwives’ ability to assess fetal heart anatomy by ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a standardized training program on midwives’ ability to assess fetal heart anatomy by ultrasound
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-14-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Hildebrand, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren, Catarina Sved, Tomas Gottvall, Marie Blomberg, Birgitta Janerot-Sjoberg

Abstract

Studies of prenatal detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) in the UK, Italy, and Norway indicate that it should be possible to improve the prenatal detection rate of CHD in Sweden. These studies have shown that training programs, visualization of the outflow tracts and color-Doppler all can help to speed up and improve the detection rate and accuracy. We aimed to introduce a more accurate standardized fetal cardiac ultrasound screening protocol in Sweden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Unspecified 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#364
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,278
of 227,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.