↓ Skip to main content

Driving Behaviors in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Driving Behaviors in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2166-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian P. Daly, Elizabeth G. Nicholls, Kristina E. Patrick, Danielle D. Brinckman, Maria T. Schultheis

Abstract

This pilot study investigated driving history and driving behaviors between adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) as compared to non-ASD adult drivers. Seventy-eight licensed drivers with ASD and 94 non-ASD comparison participants completed the Driver Behavior Questionnaire. Drivers with ASD endorsed significantly lower ratings of their ability to drive, and higher numbers of traffic accidents and citations relative to non-ASD drivers. Drivers with ASD also endorsed significantly greater numbers of difficulties on the following subscales: intentional violations, F(1, 162) = 6.15, p = .01, η p (2)  = .04; mistakes, F(1, 162) = 10.15, p = .002, η p (2)  = .06; and slips/lapses, F(1, 162) = 11.33, p = .001, η p (2)  = .07. These findings suggest that individuals with ASD who are current drivers may experience more difficulties in driving behaviors and engage in more problematic driving behaviors relative to non-ASD drivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#464,700
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#128
of 5,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,936
of 244,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.