You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental projectile impact marks on bone: implications for identifying the origins of projectile technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.036 |
| Authors |
Corey A. O'Driscoll, Jessica C. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 29 | 40% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2,131
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,727
of 248,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#53
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.