↓ Skip to main content

The Threats from Oil Spills: Now, Then, and in the Future

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
579 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Threats from Oil Spills: Now, Then, and in the Future
Published in
Ambio, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0085-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Jernelöv

Abstract

The ongoing oil spill from the blown-out well by the name of Macondo, drilled by the ill-fated rig Deepwater Horizon, has many features in common with another blowout in the Mexican Gulf that happened three decades ago. Then the oil gushed out from the Ixtoc I well drilled by the Sedco 135-F semi-submersible rig. In the years between these catastrophes, the source and nature of oil spills have undergone large changes. Huge spills from tankers that ran aground or collided used to be what caught the headlines and caused large ecological damage. The number and size of such accidental spills have decreased significantly. Instead, spills from ageing, ill-maintained or sabotaged pipelines have increased, and places like Arctic Russia, the Niger Delta, and the northwestern Amazon have become sites of reoccurring oil pollution. As for blowouts, there is no clear trend with regard to the number of incidences or amounts of spilled oil, but deepwater blowouts are much harder to cap and thus tend to go on longer and result in the release of larger quantities of oil. Also, oil exploration and extraction is moving into ever-deeper water and into stormier and icier seas, increasing potential risks. The risk for reoccurring spills like the two huge Mexican Gulf ones is eminent and must be reduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 557 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 123 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 15%
Student > Master 77 13%
Researcher 58 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 3%
Other 74 13%
Unknown 142 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 112 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 17%
Engineering 56 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 5%
Chemistry 22 4%
Other 98 17%
Unknown 161 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,044,652
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#563
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,816
of 105,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.