↓ Skip to main content

Pectoral stretching program for women undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Pectoral stretching program for women undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10549-006-9339-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.S. Lee, S.L. Kilbreath, K.M. Refshauge, S.C. Pendlebury, J.M. Beith, M.J. Lee

Abstract

Surgery and radiotherapy commonly cause adverse musculoskeletal problems, particularly loss of strength and range of motion, in the upper quadrant of breast cancer patients. Few well-designed studies have investigated whether these impairments can be prevented. Stretching is an effective technique for increasing range of motion, hence the aim of this study was to investigate whether a stretching program reduced acute musculoskeletal impairments in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. Sixty-four women were recruited prior to commencement of radiotherapy following breast cancer surgery. Participants were randomised to either a control or stretch group. Participants in both groups were reviewed by the physical therapist on a weekly basis for approximately 6 weeks, and were given general information about skin care and lymphedema. The control group received no advice about exercise. The stretch group received instruction on low-load, prolonged pectoral stretches, which were to be performed daily and were checked at weekly visits. Shoulder range of motion, strength, arm circumference, and quality of life measurements were taken prior to, and at completion of radiotherapy, and at 7 months after radiotherapy. There was no difference in any outcome between groups. Breast symptoms increased for both groups during radiotherapy, without loss of strength or range of movement. The incidence of lymphedema during the study was low for both groups and did not differ between groups. The pectoral stretching program did not influence the outcomes measured because the symptoms reported by patients were not a consequence of contracture.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Sports and Recreations 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 54 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,655
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,461
of 155,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.