| Title |
Assessment of Breast Cancer Tumor Size Depends on Method, Histopathology and Tumor Size Itself*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-005-6653-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Heusinger, C. Löhberg, M. P. Lux, T. Papadopoulos, K. Imhoff, R. Schulz-Wendtland, M. W. Beckmann, P. A. Fasching |
| Abstract |
Mammography (MG), breast (BU) and axillary ultrasound (AU), and clinical examination (CE) are commonly used for clinical staging. These different methods were compared in order to assess the accuracy of clinical tumor staging (cT). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 31% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2012.
All research outputs
#4,689,563
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#886
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,907
of 60,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.