| Title |
Integrating Assertive Community Treatment and Illness Management and Recovery for Consumers with Severe Mental Illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10597-009-9284-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle P. Salyers, Alan B. McGuire, Angela L. Rollins, Gary R. Bond, Kim T. Mueser, Veronica R. Macy |
| Abstract |
This study examined the integration of two evidence-based practices for adults with severe mental illness: Assertive community treatment (ACT) and illness management and recovery (IMR) with peer specialists as IMR practitioners. Two of four ACT teams were randomly assigned to implement IMR. Over 2 years, the ACT-IMR teams achieved moderate fidelity to the IMR model, but low penetration rates: 47 (25.7%) consumers participated in any IMR sessions and 7 (3.8%) completed the program during the study period. Overall, there were no differences in consumer outcomes at the ACT team level; however, consumers exposed to IMR showed reduced hospital use over time. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,683,109
of 23,607,611 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#136
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,132
of 168,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,607,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.