↓ Skip to main content

Loss of Pericytes in Radiation Necrosis after Glioblastoma Treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Loss of Pericytes in Radiation Necrosis after Glioblastoma Treatments
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0695-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soon-Tae Lee, Youngbeom Seo, Ji-Yeon Bae, Kon Chu, Jin Wook Kim, Seung Hong Choi, Tae Min Kim, Il Han Kim, Sung-Hye Park, Chul-Kee Park

Abstract

Radiation necrosis (RN) in brain tumor patients is often symptomatic, persistent without immediate resolution, and confused with tumor recurrence. Cerebral vascular pericytes are essential for endothelial function, vascular integrity, and angiogenesis. In this study, we showed that the loss of pericytes is involved in the pathogenesis of RN. From a brain tumor tissue repository, we identified three patients since 2011 with pathologically confirmed RN after the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM). The RN and their preradiation GBM tissues were serially processed for Western blotting using cell-type-specific antibodies against endothelial (CD31, active RhoA), pericyte [platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFR-β)], alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), astrocyte (GFAP), myelin sheath protein (MBP), and microglial markers (Iba1). Normal brain tissues from a brain bank were used as normal controls. The expressions of PDGFR-β and α-SMA were remarkably reduced in the RN, compared to those of GBM. However, the levels of CD31 or RhoA were not different between the two groups, which suggest that there was no change in the number of endothelial cells or their cytoskeletal assembly. The RN tissues showed a decreased ratio of pericyte/endothelial markers and an increased level of Iba1 compared to the GBM and even to the normal brain. The levels of GFAP and MBP were not changed in the RN. In the histopathology, the RN tissues showed a loss of markers (PDGFR-β), whereas the GBM tissues had abundant expression of the markers. The loss of pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, and the unsupported endothelial cells might be the cause of the leaky blood-brain barrier and tissue necrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Neuroscience 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,731,682
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,920
of 3,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,428
of 327,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#56
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.