↓ Skip to main content

Conformational Effects of a Common Codon 399 Polymorphism on the BRCT1 Domain of the XRCC1 Protein

Overview of attention for article published in The Protein Journal, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Conformational Effects of a Common Codon 399 Polymorphism on the BRCT1 Domain of the XRCC1 Protein
Published in
The Protein Journal, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10930-007-9095-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Monaco, Ramon Rosal, Michael A. Dolan, Matthew R. Pincus, Paul W. Brandt-Rauf

Abstract

The X-ray cross-complementing-1 (XRCC1) protein functions as a scaffold that coordinates the activity of the cellular machinery involved in base excision repair (BER) of DNA damage. The BRCT1 domain of XRCC1 is responsible for interacting with several of the key components of the BER machinery, and it is also the site of a common genetic polymorphism in XRCC1 at amino acid residue 399 (Arg --> Gln). Experimental and epidemiologic evidence suggest that this polymorphism may alter BER capacity and increase cancer risk. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these effects could be attributable to conformational changes in XRCC1 induced by the polymorphism. Molecular dynamics techniques were used to predict the structure of the wild-type and polymorphic forms of the BRCT1 domain of XRCC1, and differences in structure produced by the polymorphic substitution were determined. The results indicate that, although the general configuration of both proteins is similar and there is little actual deviation at the site of the polymorphism itself, the substitution produces significant conformational changes at several other sites in the BRCT1 domain, including the loss of secondary structural features such as alpha helices that may be critical for protein-protein interactions. These results provide support for the hypothesis that this polymorphism in XRCC1 could affect DNA repair capability by altering the structure of the BRCT1 domain and thus the ability of XRCC1 to coordinate BER.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Protein Journal
#577
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,263
of 84,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Protein Journal
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.