| Title |
Dairy foods intake and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-014-9921-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenjie Jiang, Chuanxia Ju, Hong Jiang, Dongfeng Zhang |
| Abstract |
Dairy foods have been linked to Parkinson's disease (PD), and a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies on dairy foods intake and PD risk was conducted. Eligible studies were identified in a literature search of EMBASE and PubMed up to April 2014. Seven results from prospective studies were included, including 1,083 PD cases among 304,193 subjects. The combined risk of PD for highest vs. lowest level of dairy foods intake was 1.40 (1.20-1.63) overall, 1.66 (1.29-2.14) for men and 1.15 (0.85-1.56) for women. For highest vs. lowest level, the PD risk was 1.45 (1.23-1.73) for milk, 1.26 (0.99-1.60) for cheese, 0.95 (0.76-1.20) for yogurt and 0.76 (0.51-1.13) for butter. The linear dose-response relationship showed that PD risk increased by 17 % [1.17 (1.06-1.30)] for every 200 g/day increment in milk intake (Pfor non-linearity = 0.22), and 13 % [1.13 (0.91-1.40)] for every 10 g/day increment in cheese intake (Pfor non-linearity = 0.39). The absolute risk differences were estimated to be 2-4 PD cases per 100,000 person-years for every 200 g/day increment in milk intake, and 1-3 PD cases per 100,000 person-years for every 10 g/day increment in cheese intake. Dairy foods (milk, cheese) might be positively associated with increased risk of PD, especially for men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#109,032
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#30
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#825
of 242,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.