You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Neck-specific Exercise With, or Without a Behavioral Approach, on Pain, Disability, and Self-Efficacy in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical journal of pain, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria L. Ludvigsson, Gunnel Peterson, Shaun O’Leary, Åsa Dedering, Anneli Peolsson |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to compare the effect on self-rated pain, disability and self-efficacy of three interventions for the management of chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD): physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise, physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise with the addition of a behavioral approach, or prescription of physical activity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Spain | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 74% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
| Researcher | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 117 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 97 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 6% |
| Psychology | 24 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Unknown | 131 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,000,658
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#85
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,515
of 274,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.