↓ Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the Context of Spatial Conservation Prioritization

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
57 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evaluation of Marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the Context of Spatial Conservation Prioritization
Published in
Conservation Letters, September 2017
DOI 10.1111/conl.12399
Authors

Jennifer McGowan, Robert J. Smith, Moreno Di Marco, Rohan H. Clarke, Hugh P. Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Unspecified 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,180,973
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#398
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,637
of 323,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.