You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic variation in mitotic regulatory pathway genes is associated with breast tumor grade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Molecular Genetics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/hmg/ddu300 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen S. Purrington, Seth Slettedahl, Manjeet K. Bolla, Kyriaki Michailidou, Kamila Czene, Heli Nevanlinna, Stig E. Bojesen, Irene L. Andrulis, Angela Cox, Per Hall, Jane Carpenter, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Christopher A. Haiman, Peter A. Fasching, Arto Mannermaa, Robert Winqvist, Hermann Brenner, Annika Lindblom, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Javier Benitez, Anthony Swerdlow, Vessela Kristensen, Pascal Guénel, Alfons Meindl, Hatef Darabi, Mikael Eriksson, Rainer Fagerholm, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Xianshu Wang, Curtis Olswold, Janet E. Olson, Anna Marie Mulligan, Julia A. Knight, Sandrine Tchatchou, Malcolm W.R. Reed, Simon S. Cross, Jianjun Liu, Jingmei Li, Keith Humphreys, Christine Clarke, Rodney Scott, Florentia Fostira, George Fountzilas, Irene Konstantopoulou, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Arif B. Ekici, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W. Beckmann, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Veli-Matti Kosma, Vesa Kataja, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Katri Pylkäs, Saila Kauppila, Aida Karina Dieffenbach, Christa Stegmaier, Volker Arndt, Sara Margolin, Rosemary Balleine, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, M. Pilar Zamora, Primitiva Menéndez, Alan Ashworth, Michael Jones, Nick Orr, Patrick Arveux, Pierre Kerbrat, Thérèse Truong, Peter Bugert, Amanda E. Toland, Christine B. Ambrosone, France Labrèche, Mark S. Goldberg, Martine Dumont, Argyrios Ziogas, Eunjung Lee, Gillian S. Dite, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C. Southey, Jirong Long, Martha Shrubsole, Sandra Deming-Halverson, Filomena Ficarazzi, Monica Barile, Paolo Peterlongo, Katarzyna Durda, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Robert A.E.M. Tollenaar, Caroline Seynaeve, Thomas Brüning, Yon-Dschun Ko, Carolien H.M. Van Deurzen, John W.M. Martens, Mieke Kriege, Jonine D. Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller, Andreas Schneeweiss, William J. Tapper, Susan M. Gerty, Lorraine Durcan, Catriona Mclean, Roger L. Milne, Laura Baglietto, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Laura J. Van'T Veer, Sten Cornelissen, Asta Försti, Diana Torres, Thomas Rüdiger, Anja Rudolph, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Stefan Nickels, Caroline Weltens, Giuseppe Floris, Matthieu Moisse, Joe Dennis, Qin Wang, Alison M. Dunning, Mitul Shah, Judith Brown, Jacques Simard, Hoda Anton-Culver, Susan L. Neuhausen, John L. Hopper, Natalia Bogdanova, Thilo Dörk, Wei Zheng, Paolo Radice, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Peter Devillee, Hiltrud Brauch, Maartje Hooning, Montserrat García-Closas, Elinor Sawyer, Barbara Burwinkel, Frederick Marmee, Diana M. Eccles, Graham G. Giles, Julian Peto, Marjanka Schmidt, Annegien Broeks, Ute Hamann, Jenny Chang-Claude, Diether Lambrechts, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Douglas Easton, V. Shane Pankratz, Susan Slager, Celine M. Vachon, Fergus J. Couch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Professor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2014.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#8,114
of 8,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,292
of 245,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#115
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.