↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of the Carpet View system: a novel technical solution for display and off line analysis of OCT images

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Reproducibility of the Carpet View system: a novel technical solution for display and off line analysis of OCT images
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0464-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Gabriele, Valeria Marco, Laura Gatto, Giulia Paoletti, Luca Di Vito, Fausto Castriota, Enrico Romagnoli, Andrea Ricciardi, Francesco Prati

Abstract

The optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation of the stent anatomy requires the inspection of sequential cross section (CS). However stent coils cannot be appreciated in the conventional format as the OCT CS simply display stent struts, that are poorly representative of the stent architecture. The aim of the present study was to validate a new software (Carpet View), which unfolds the stented segment, reconstructing it as an open structure and displaying the stent meshwork. 21 patients were studied with frequency domain OCT after the deployment of different stents: seven bio-absorbable scaffolds (Dream), seven bare metal stent (Vision/Multilink8), seven drug eluting stent (Cre8). Conventional CS reconstructions were post-processed with the Carpet View software and analyzed by the same reader twice (intra-observer variability) and by two different readers (inter-observer variability). A small average difference in the number of all struts was obtained with the two methods (conventional vs carpet view reconstruction). Using the carpet view, high intra-observer and inter-observer correlations were found for the number of struts obtained in each coil. The Pearson correlation values were 0.98 (p = 0.0001) and 0.96 (p = 0.0001) respectively. The same number of coils was found when analyses were repeated by the same reader or by a different reader whilst mild differences in the count of stent junctions were reported. The Carpet View can be used to address the stent geometry with high reproducibility. This approach enables the matching of the same stent portion during serial time points and promises to improve the stent assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,710,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#68
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,576
of 242,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.