| Title |
Opinion-based entity ranking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Information Retrieval Journal, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10791-011-9174-8 |
| Authors |
Kavita Ganesan, ChengXiang Zhai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 35 | 55% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval Journal
#62
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,762
of 137,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them