↓ Skip to main content

Predictive markers of abdominal aortic stiffness measured by echo-tracking in subjects with varying insulin sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Hypertension, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive markers of abdominal aortic stiffness measured by echo-tracking in subjects with varying insulin sensitivity
Published in
Journal of Human Hypertension, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/jhh.2013.126
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Gottsäter, T Länne, P M Nilsson

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is influenced by advancing age and vascular disease and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and death. Using ultrasound measurements, arterial stiffness in a specific arterial segment can be assessed. The aim of this observational study was to explore the prospective and cross-sectional associations between arterial stiffness measured by ultrasound locally in the abdominal aorta and cardiovascular risk factors/markers including insulin resistance measured by the homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipids and abdominal obesity. This study includes 335 subjects from Malmö, Sweden, examined in 1991-1994 and again at follow-up in 1998-2000 (mean age 64 years, 42% men). Ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta was performed at follow-up investigation. In the female subgroup, there was a positive association between HOMA-IR at baseline and abdominal aortic stiffness at follow-up (β=0.18, P=0.03) and a negative association between high-density lipoprotein and aortic stiffness (β=-0.23, P=0.005), independently of classical cardiovascular risk factors. These associations were not found among men. The results suggest a greater or different role of impaired glucose metabolism in the pathophysiology of arterial stiffness in women than in men.Journal of Human Hypertension advance online publication, 2 January 2014; doi:10.1038/jhh.2013.126.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Hypertension
#1,156
of 1,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,338
of 305,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Hypertension
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.