Title |
MRI screening for silicone breast implant rupture: accuracy, inter- and intraobserver variability using explantation results as reference standard
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-014-3119-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. C. Maijers, F. B. Niessen, J. F. H. Veldhuizen, M. J. P. F. Ritt, R. A. Manoliu |
Abstract |
The recall of Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast implants in 2010 resulted in large numbers of asymptomatic women with implants who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. This study's aim was to assess the accuracy and interobserver variability of MRI screening in the detection of rupture and extracapsular silicone leakage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,940,716
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,023
of 4,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,624
of 221,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.