↓ Skip to main content

Influence of comorbid alcohol use disorder on treatment response of depressive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Influence of comorbid alcohol use disorder on treatment response of depressive patients
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00702-014-1254-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eri Hashimoto, Masaya Tayama, Hiromi Ishikawa, Megumi Yamamoto, Toshikazu Saito

Abstract

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently also have alcohol use disorder (AUD) and they are more likely to experience symptomatic recurrence and resist treatment. How the two disorders interrelate has not yet been fully examined in Japanese subjects. The treatment response of 47 MDD patients was followed for 12 weeks. Depressive symptoms were rated by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and those whose HAM-D score was less than 16 were excluded. The MDD patients were divided into a non-alcohol use disorder (NAUD) and an alcohol use disorder (AUD) group according to the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). We applied a cutoff score of 12 in the AUDIT scale. After 8 weeks, HAM-D NAUD group scores were significantly lower compared with AUD patients. The NAUD group, 23 individuals, prescribed therapeutic doses of antidepressant (equivalent to more than 150 mg of imipramine per day) significantly improved their HAM-D scores but no improvement occurred in the AUD subjects. Correlation analysis in all subjects revealed a significant negative correlation between AUDIT score and improved HAM-D score at endpoint. Moreover, a significant negative correlation was found between total alcohol consumption during the study period and improvement of HAM-D score at endpoint in AUD patients. These results suggest that co-occurrence of MDD and AUD is associated with a lower response to antidepressant treatment and it may reflect an inhibitory effect of ethanol on antidepressants action in the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,781,727
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1,200
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,249
of 228,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.