| Title |
Reinforced evidence of a low-yield nuclear test in North Korea on 11 May 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10967-013-2678-5 |
| Authors |
Lars-Erik De Geer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 44% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,437,978
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#27
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,465
of 204,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.