You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wetland Accretion Rate Model of Ecosystem Resilience (WARMER) and Its Application to Habitat Sustainability for Endangered Species in the San Francisco Estuary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12237-013-9694-0 |
| Authors |
Kathleen M. Swanson, Judith Z. Drexler, David H. Schoellhamer, Karen M. Thorne, Mike L. Casazza, Cory T. Overton, John C. Callaway, John Y. Takekawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,097,913
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#574
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,090
of 207,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.