You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-99 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew Glover, Martin Buxton, Susan Guthrie, Stephen Hanney, Alexandra Pollitt, Jonathan Grant |
Abstract |
Building on an approach developed to assess the economic returns to cardiovascular research, we estimated the economic returns from UK public and charitable funded cancer-related research that arise from the net value of the improved health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 38 | 45% |
United States | 7 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 58 | 69% |
Scientists | 14 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 44 | 33% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 21% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#215,618
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#185
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,571
of 230,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.