↓ Skip to main content

Experiments with the Site Frequency Spectrum

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Experiments with the Site Frequency Spectrum
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11538-010-9605-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raazesh Sainudiin, Kevin Thornton, Jennifer Harlow, James Booth, Michael Stillman, Ruriko Yoshida, Robert Griffiths, Gil McVean, Peter Donnelly

Abstract

Evaluating the likelihood function of parameters in highly-structured population genetic models from extant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences is computationally prohibitive. In such cases, one may approximately infer the parameters from summary statistics of the data such as the site-frequency-spectrum (SFS) or its linear combinations. Such methods are known as approximate likelihood or Bayesian computations. Using a controlled lumped Markov chain and computational commutative algebraic methods, we compute the exact likelihood of the SFS and many classical linear combinations of it at a non-recombining locus that is neutrally evolving under the infinitely-many-sites mutation model. Using a partially ordered graph of coalescent experiments around the SFS, we provide a decision-theoretic framework for approximate sufficiency. We also extend a family of classical hypothesis tests of standard neutrality at a non-recombining locus based on the SFS to a more powerful version that conditions on the topological information provided by the SFS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
United Kingdom 2 6%
India 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Philippines 1 3%
Unknown 25 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 53%
Mathematics 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%