↓ Skip to main content

The role of social values in the management of ecological systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
615 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of social values in the management of ecological systems
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Ives, Dave Kendal

Abstract

The concept of value is central to the practice and science of ecological management and conservation. There is a well-developed body of theory and evidence that explores concepts of value in different ways across different disciplines including philosophy, economics, sociology and psychology. Insight from these disciplines provides a robust and sophisticated platform for considering the role of social values in ecological conservation, management and research. This paper reviews theories of value from these disciplines and discusses practical tools and instruments that can be utilised by researchers and practitioners. A distinction is highlighted between underlying values that shape people's perception of the world (e.g. altruistic or biospheric value orientations), and the values that people assign to things in the world (e.g. natural heritage, money). Evidence from numerous studies has shown that there are multiple pathways between these values and attitudes, beliefs and behaviours relevant to ecological management and conservation. In an age of increasing anthropogenic impacts on natural systems, recognising how and why people value different aspects of ecological systems can allow ecological managers to act to minimise conflict between stakeholders and promote the social acceptability of management activities. A series of practical guidelines are provided to enable social values to be better considered in ecosystem management and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 615 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 598 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 23%
Researcher 98 16%
Student > Master 94 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 6%
Student > Bachelor 36 6%
Other 85 14%
Unknown 121 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 181 29%
Social Sciences 81 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 3%
Other 86 14%
Unknown 151 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,811,861
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Management
#605
of 6,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,325
of 248,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Management
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.