↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan populations of the gobiid species, Pterogobius elapoides and Pterogobius zonoleucus, based on molecular and morphological analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Gene, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 10,957)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
268 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan populations of the gobiid species, Pterogobius elapoides and Pterogobius zonoleucus, based on molecular and morphological analyses
Published in
Gene, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihito, Akishinonomiya Fumihito, Yuji Ikeda, Masahiro Aizawa, Takashi Makino, Yumi Umehara, Yoshiaki Kai, Yuriko Nishimoto, Masami Hasegawa, Tetsuji Nakabo, Takashi Gojobori

Abstract

Pterogobius elapoides and Pterogobius zonoleucus are common free-swimming gobies found in rocky and weedy shores along the temperate coast of Japan. We collected individuals of both species from 23 locations around the coast of Japan and compared the mitochondrial nucleotide sequences of two gene regions, CytB and ND2. Phylogenetic trees constructed using the neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood methods consistently indicated that all 125 samples of the two species, which are collected from a variety of locations in Japan, can be clearly divided into the following four clades: "Pacific P. elapoides" (Pa-ela), "Sea of Japan P. elapoides" (SJ-ela), "Pacific P. zonoleucus" (Pa-zon), and "Sea of Japan P. zonoleucus" (SJ-zon). These four monophyletic clades were supported with very high bootstrap values. Although Pa-ela and SJ-ela composed a monophyletic clade, it is noteworthy that the two clades of P. elapoides also formed a monophyletic group together with SJ-zon with a bootstrap value of 95% and 97% by the maximum likelihood and neighbor-joining methods, respectively. We observed several morphological differences between Pa-ela and SJ-ela, including; 1) six dark bands on the body in the former versus seven dark bands in the latter and 2) more pectoral-fin rays numbering 21-24 (mode 22) in the latter compared to the former (19-22, mode 21). Furthermore, the scatter plots of scores on principal components 1 and 2 based on the morphometric characters roughly separated the populations from each other. Moreover, we documented the following morphological differences between Pa-zon and SJ-zon for the first time; 1) six light bands on the body in the former versus five light bands in the latter and 2) the light bands from both eyes forming a complete U-shaped marking on the occipital region occurred in 55% of the specimens in the former versus 16% in the latter. However, no significant differences were found in the morphometric characters between the two populations of P. zonoleucus. The estimated divergence time of the two P. zonoleucus populations was 15.06+/-2.72 (mean+/-1 S.E.) times earlier than that of the two P. elapoides populations. However, the morphological differences between the two populations of the former were much smaller than those of the latter. An explanation for this obvious discrepancy between morphological and molecular features is proposed from an evolutionary point of view.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 268 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 6 6%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 56%
Chemistry 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 7 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#180,368
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#2
of 10,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340
of 102,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.